This is a mirror of the ECAS 4 conference website on http://www.nai.uu.se/

Search result

Nothing to search for

No hits

Type one or more search terms into the search box and click on the search button.

The search engine does not distinguish between lowercase and uppercase letters.

A results page will be produced: a list of web pages related to your search terms, with the most relevant page appearing first, then the next, and so on.

Boolean operators
The operator AND is set as default between words. You can combine several words or phrases by using the logical operators ‘OR’ and ‘AND’.

You can also use plus or minus marks for including or excluding words (see below).

Ranking
The more of the words that are present in the page, the higher is the score.

If words appear in the same order as in your query, and close to each other, the score of the document gets high.

Phrase Search
Use quotation marks to compound phrases. If you wish to search for a phrase, you write text inside “…”quotation marks.

Eg. "African studies"

Truncation
Use * for truncation of search terms. A search term does not always have to be entered in its complete form. Search terms may be truncated from left or right.

Eg. Tanza* or even *anza*

Prioritizing Words
Plus marks a word as necessary. By preceding a word or a phrase with a plus sign, you tell the search engine that you are only looking for documents that contain that word/phrase.

Eg. +policy +activities

Word Exclusion
Minus marks a word as not wanted. By preceding a word or phrase with a minus sign, you tell the search engine to exclude that word/phrase and only to look for documents that match the rest of the query.

Eg. nordic -africa –institute

Panel 37: Anthropologists and War in the Field. A Problematic Undertaking

Panel organiser: Francesca Declich (Univ. of Urbino, Italy) and Marjia De Brujin (Centre of African Studies, The Netherlands)

Contact: francesca.declich@uniurb.it

In the last twenty years in many countries of Africa new armed conflicts and civil wars have blown up, have started and sometimes, finished. Anthropologists, therefore, found themselves involved in studying countries where the war had become a daily life concern. Some did carry out field work in such countries before the war blew up and find themselves researching in countries badly affected by the war and/or in continuous contact with refugees while others started their research work in such conditions. Doing fieldwork and/or keeping on carrying out research work with people involved or afflicted by civil strives is not an issue without consequences both for the research aims as well as for the researchers involved in such process of knowledge production. A number of ethical problems are embedded in the very fact of spending time with people in countries troubled by the war, where living or dying is linked to chances and fortuitous events, just for the sake of producing knowledge, books or some articles. All the more this is an issue relevant for anthropologists for whom the personal involvement and participant method is an unavoidable aspect of the epistemology of the knowledge they seek. The inevitable reflexive aspects of the very fact of researching in context of war is something a number of researchers consider a difficult personal undertaking so that they prefer, if they live in countries not at war, to distance themselves from such kinds of field. This panel aims at fostering reflections on such and other aspects related to carrying out research work in countries badly affected by the war and at, may be, unrevealing reasons for the uneasiness anthropologists and other scholars experience in such contexts.

Accepted Abstracts

Historical Fieldwork on War in Tuareg Society

Finding Yourself Into a War as an Anthropologist: Responsibility and Reluctance

Between War and Peace. An Anthropologist in South Sudanese Juba

Temporalities of War

Adrenaline, disgust and laughter: conflicting emotions while researching violence

Search Help